Archive for the ‘Divertisment, ironie, sarcasm, uneori si cinism’ Category

Daca n-ai ce face, pune mana si citeste-mi ebook-urile!

Iunie 9, 2015

An Empire Of Traitors

Flesh will bleed. Bones will break. Swords will turn.
An Empire Of Traitors follows several principal storylines simultaneously. It’s been eight years since the end of the civil war between the Inquisition and emperor Zygar Ferus, worshiper of blood gods. Eight years into the aftermath, a new emperor sits the Sun Throne, and the Inquisition is no more.
In the five realms of the Empire things are stirring. Driven by ambition or wounded pride, many nobles like the dog-headed serpent of Stoneweed seek to change their fortunes, even with the price of treachery. And from exile, from the heathen nations of the Lowlands, another Sunborn scion of house Mero gathers strength behind his claim. No family, great or small, shall remain indifferent to fate’s whim. It takes an emperor to rule an empire, but it takes numbers and honored oaths to keep both crown and throne.
In the Westlands, Drakanes, a sister of the temple finds herself in the role of witness and proctor, of passing judgement on a man accused of murder, who claims to have been possessed. The trial’s proceedings enlighten her as to the truth of it all, and the good sister is willing to, out of pure stubbornness, risk death for justice. Emperor Hagyai Rovines Mero fears for the continuation of his line, and sends Sycarus on an errand to the Desertlands to bring back an Aharo maiden for his son and heir. It is said that the Aharo savage women always give birth to healthy babes. Hagyai Rovines desires a betrothal between the prince heir and a savage girl – trying to emulate a long dead custom of the Sunborn emperors. Such a move is most unpopular, and the whispers of another civil war are once again in the air.
The imperial chancellor warns Birus Mandon, lord of Rivermark and warden of the Streamlands, of a plot against the emperor, a plot made by his exiled brother, Amarius Soronius. Mandon tries to gather knowledge on the schemes of potential oathbreakers, but his trade is not that of a spy. When he hires the Mounted Arrows Company of Narak al Zull, Birus learns more than mere outlandish tactics; he finds a new source of strength in the sellsword’s foreign warrior god.
Kalafar Sodomis, lord of Weiyenor and warden of the Northlands, has seen his brother get married, and he himself is tried by notions of passion toward a certain lady of a southern house. But as the conflict breaks out, Kalafar needs to act as a proper lord, as a man, not a boy. He summons his vassals for a council at Devil Mound, to decide if the north will go to war or no; and there to also perform a certain ritual to honor the dead of Fengard and Wyrm.
Find out how it all unfolds by reading An Empire Of Traitors, the first book in the series Of Hate And Laughter.

Amazon Kindle


A Heretical Divide

A Heretical Divide picks up right where An Empire Of Traitors left off. The Inquisition proves itself a hydra of murderers and schemers. The ram’s war in the Winterlands gets mired in betrayal, and the hawk’s vengeance comes to the devil’s home under sorcery and ploy. Even with a new emperor, the Sun Throne’s vassals are still brewing; each house following its own petty interests. Death’s breath looms upon the weak and strong, upon country and sovereign. The princes of ruin have many servants upon the earth – many souls to claim by storm and blood.

Amazon Kindle


Follow Magnus, Korvern, and Septimius in this black-humored short story as they talk on all manner of aspects. From stray dogs and men of evil hearts, to matters of politics and things preternatural. Fiscal austerity, cats, dead elders, and evil spirits to name a few. Strange things for crows to ponder on, indeed. Also, you’ll find two sample chapters from the 1st and 2nd OHAL books.

Amazon Kindle



Hell March Industry and Future

Martie 1, 2015

Asta e cea de a II-a tentativa a mea de a face un clip pentru youtube.

Scopul clipului e acela de a distra urechea si ochiul, si de a incuraja audienta sa se familiarizeze cu Teoria Monetara Moderna.

Ca sa mai radem, check this bloke out

Februarie 11, 2015

Clericii anti-card, prosti, timpiti, si idioti

Octombrie 28, 2014

Domnule, ei sustin ca acest cuvant *CARD* citit invers da *DRAC*, ergo, asa ceva nu-i a buna si ei sunt impotriva cardului de sanatate.

Hai sa vedem etimologia and vechimea acestui cuvant (card).

card (n.1) Look up card at Dictionary.comc.1400, „playing card,” from Middle French carte (14c.), from Latin charta „leaf of paper, tablet,” from Greek khartes „layer of papyrus,” probably from Egyptian. Form influenced after 14c. by Italian carta (see chart (n.)).


Deci card e cuvant imprumutat. Odata din Franceza (secolul 14) „carte”, carte de joc. Din Latina, „charta”, insemnand foaie de hartie/tableta. Din Greaca, „khartes”, insemnand strat de papirus, probabil cu influente Egiptene. Dupa secolul 14, „carta”, forma cuvantului influentata de limba Italiana.


Alte fete bisericesti sunt contra cardului de sanatate, invocand nu-stiu-ce atingeri sau prejudicii aduse drepturilor civile. Dar eu va intreb prea piosilor, de ce nu sariti de cur in sus si cu gura mare atunci cand politicienii CHIAR ataca drepturile omului? Atunci cand ei iau masuri de austeritate fara nicio justificare (ca Romania are forta de munca si resurse neutilizate cu carul)? Chiar nu vedeti cum traiesc pensionarii in tara asta? Cum sunt tratati bolnavii in spitale? Cum ingheata copiii in scoli? Nu vedeti cum traiesc saracii? Cum sunt tratati oamenii muncitori atat de catre mediul privat cat si de stat?

Am pus niste intrebari, si am raspuns la ele. Raspunsul este nu; nu va pas. Voua va pasa numai de balivernele voastre dogmatice si superstitioase. Va pasa doar de banii aia NEIMPOZITATI, pe care-i luati NUMAI in numerar. Imi vin in cap niste versuri de la Parazitii (nu-mi place trupa, dar cuvintele astea se potrivesc manusa)… Muie voua si celor ce v-asculta. Sunt constient ca asta inseamna marea majoritate a cetatenilor tarii. But you know what? I don’t give a shit.

Sarah Palin vrea sa invadeze Cehia (Parodie from Daily Currant)

Aprilie 23, 2013


Intr-un interviu la televiziunea pentru ratatii razboinici de dreapta fara de leac, fostul guvernator al statului Alaska, Sarah Palin, a spus:

„We don’t know everything about these suspects yet,” Palin told Fox and Friends this morning, referring to Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who allegedly carried out the Boston Marathon attacks. „But we know they were Muslims from the Czech Republic.

„I betcha I speak for a lot of Americans when I say I want to go over there right now and start teaching those folks a lesson. And let’s not stop at the Czech Republic, let’s go after all Arab countries.

„The Arabians need to learn that they can’t keep comin’ over here and blowing stuff up. Let’s set off a couple of nukes in Islamabad, burn down Prague, then bomb the heck out of Tehran. We need to show them that we mean business.”

Desi gazdele emisiunii, Steve Doocy si Gretchen Carlson, au incercat sa corecteze geografia intervievatei, Sarah Palin, acestia i-au salutat sovinismul.

„Well Islamabad is the capital of Pakistan, which isn’t Arab,” Carlson corrected, „and Tehran is the capital of Iran, which is predominantly Persian. But I do see your point.”

„Also Czech Republic isn’t really an Arab or even Muslim country, I don’t think,” Doocy added, „but otherwise what you’re saying makes a lot of sense. I think most Americans wish Obama would step up and lead on this one.”

Dar Palin nu se lasa intimidata si continua.

„Steve, that’s probably one of the most ignorant things I’ve ever heard. How is Czech Republic not a Muslim country? You saw those brothers, they were Islamic and they were Chechen!”

„Yes there were Muslim and they were ethnic Chechens,” Doocy started, „but they grew up mostly in Kyrgyzstan and the United States. And more importantly, Chechens don’t come from the Czech Republic, they come from Chechnya, which is part of Russia. „

„What’s the difference?” Palin responded. „Isn’t Russia part of the Czech Republic?”

„No, the Czech Republic is a separate country. It’s part of the European Union and a strong NATO ally,” Doocy noted. „But heck, why not? Let’s invade. What could go wrong?”

„Yeah and while we’re at it,” Carlson added, „let’s call the Queen of England and see if the U.K. will join us.”

Dupa acest interviu, Palin a acuzat Fox News pentru agenda lor partinitoare pro-islamica si „pro-geografie”. Palin chiar a bagat Fox News in aceeasi oala cu presa liberala. LOL!

Mare ti-e gradina ta Doamne. Nu-i de mirare ca nimeni nu-i suporta pe americanii republicani. Ce conteaza ca cecenii nu sunt cehi, ca Cehia nu face parte din Rusia, ca iranienii sunt persi, ca pakistanezii nu sunt arabi, ca nu toti arabii sunt teroristi, ce conteaza ca esti o curva politica finantata sa spui prostii sovine si razboinice, ce conteaza ca habar n-ai pic de geografie, conteaza sa fii un american dur si „patriot”. Nu va faceti griji, dragi republicani. Dumnezeu iubeste DOAR America, uraste orice alta tara care „nu-i cu voi” si ii uraste pe democratii aia nenorociti de stanga (socialisti/comunisti). God Bless America! In God we trust!

PS: Interviul/povestea este o parodie, iar comentariile mele sunt un pamflet 😛

42 reasons to loathe Margaret Thatcher, by a british citizen

Aprilie 9, 2013

1. She supported the retention of capital punishment.
2. She destroyed the country’s manufacturing industry, creating the untenable situation Britain endures today whereby we import everything from either Germany, the USA, or China. Britain went from a world leader in manufacturing to an international joke.
3. She voted against the relaxation of divorce laws.
4. She abolished free milk for schoolchildren („Margaret Thatcher, Milk Snatcher” being a popular slogan at the time).
5. She supported more freedom for business (and look how that has turned out).
6. She gained support from the National Front in the 1979 election by pandering to the fears of immigration.
7. She gerrymandered local authorities by forcing through council house sales, at the same time preventing councils from spending the money they got for selling houses on building new houses (spending on social housing dropped by 67% in her premiership).
8. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed – the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million, and this still does not take into account those forced on to incapacity benefits.
9. She ignored intelligence about Argentinian preparations for the invasion of the Falkland Islands and scrapped the only Royal Navy presence in the islands.
10. The poll tax (an unfair tax levied equally on every member of society regardless of income)
11. She presided over the closure of 150 coal mines; we are now crippled by the cost of energy, having to import expensive coal from abroad.
12. She compared her „fight” against the miners to the Falklands War.
13. She privatised state monopolies such as energy and created the corporate greed culture that we’ve been railing against for the last 5 years.
14. She introduced the gradual privatisation of the NHS.
15. She introduced financial deregulation in a way that turned city institutions into avaricious money pits which led directly to the 2008 crash.
16. She pioneered the unfailing adoration and unquestioning support of the USA, prior to this support had been more bilateral and measured.
17. She allowed the US to place nuclear missiles on UK soil, under US control.
18. Section 28, a homophobic clause reading that a local council „shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality” or „promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship”.
19. She opposed anti-apartheid sanctions against South Africa and described Nelson Mandela as „that grubby little terrorist”.
20. She supported the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and sent the SAS to train their soldiers.
21. She allowed the US to bomb Libya in 1986, against the wishes of more than 2/3 of the population.
22. She opposed the reunification of Germany.
23. She invented Quangos (shady government/private bodies with powers to influence policy but very little supervision)
24. She increased VAT from 8% to 17.5%, an evil flat tax on all.
25. She had the lowest approval rating of any post-war Prime Minister
26. Her post-PM job? Consultant to Philip Morris tobacco at $250,000 a year, plus $50,000 per speech
27. The Al Yamamah contract
28. She opposed the indictment of Chile’s General Pinochet.
29. Social unrest under her leadership was higher than at any time since the General Strike.
30. She presided over interest rates increasing to 15%.
31. BSE (deregulation of what could be fed to farm animals).
32. She presided over 2 million manufacturing job losses in the 79-81 recession.
33. She opposed the inclusion of Eire in the Northern Ireland peace process, exacerbating the feeling of unrest amongst the Catholic population.
34. She supported sanctions-busting arms deals with South Africa during apartied.
35. Cecil Parkinson, Alan Clark, David Mellor, Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitkin, corruption after corruption.
36. Crime rates doubled under Thatcher.
37. Black Wednesday – Britain withdraws from the ERM and the pound is devalued. Cost to Britain – £3.5 billion; profit for George Soros – £1 billion.
38. Poverty doubled whilst she opposed a minimum wage.
39. She privatised public services, claiming at the time it would increase public ownership. Most are now owned either by foreign governments (EDF) or major investment houses. The profits don’t now accrue to the taxpayer, but to foreign or institutional shareholders. British energy bills fund cheap energy for the rest of the continent.
40. She cut 75% of funding to museums, galleries and other sources of education.
41. In the Thatcher years the top 10% of earners received almost 50% of the tax remissions.
42. 21.9% inflation.

She inspired many other governments to instigate similar reforms as part of the massive lurch to the right in the last 30 years.
The list of reasons why this woman deserves to rot in hell for all eternity is endless.

Post made by Lord Weasel on the Ars-Regendi forums:

Mircea Badea, Te basesc

Martie 8, 2013

Mancatorii de cacat vis-a-vis de Nicolaescu si averea lui (Vadim inca o mai suge)

Ianuarie 7, 2013

Vadim Tudor a vorbit la RTV despre MAREA NENOROCIRE, incinerarea lesului. Ba chiar a mers intr-acolo sa spuna ca, „De ce duduia vaduva s-a grabit cu incinerarea? Nu cumva vroia sa distruga ADN-ul lui, ca sa nu mai poata pretendentu’ sa faca testu’ de paternitate?” Vesnica obsesie romaneasca de intrigi si strambe. Dar stai ca Vadim a vorbit el cu surse, generali, colonei, (vesnica lui scuza) ca vezi domne, se poate preleva ADN si din cenusa. Pai bai distrusule, tu crezi ca spitalele n-au mostre din AND-ul lui? Tu crezi ca vaduva l-a ars ca sa nu imparta averea? Esti ULTIMUL OM DE PE PAMANT, CEL MAI MARE NENOROCIT, pentru insinuarea asta pe care ai facut-o la adresa nevestesii. Nicolaescu a zis demult ca vrea sa fie incinerat, a spus public ca regreta ca n-a avut copii si nepoti. Pretendentul asta, care are resedinta in Germania si care are peste 30 de ani, ce pula mea a stat in obscuritate atatia ani? De ce a iesit tocmai acum dupa moartea lu’ Nicolaescu? Daca nu era interesat de avere, de ce n-a iesit public sa spuna ca el e bastardu’ lu Nicolaescu, cand ala era in viata, si regreta faptu’ ca n-are mostenitori? Si apoi tot Vadim e cu gura mare, si acuza antenele ca sunt „anticrestine”, ca Voiculescu ataca Patriarhia romana – doar pentru ca Badea si altii i-au criticat pe cei care au huiduit-o pe vaduva lu’ Nicolaescu. Vadime, uita-te in sondajele alea, ca a ajuns PRM-ul sa aiba un scor mai mic ca Partidu’ Civic Maghiar. Adevar ai grait, cand ai spus ca tu esti PRM, dar n-ai avut dreptate and ai zis ca PRM-ul se va prabusi fara tine. Din contra, TU ai prabusit PRM-ul. Continua sa sprijini toti neavenitii si continua sa te crezi cel mai breaz dintre brazi. Esti cel mai mare predicator de sofisme. Ai un ego cat casa, suferi de diaree verbala, si esti un elocvent disimulator, un ipocrit, si esti smecher si cand vine vorba de injuraturi si laturi. Tu te bagi total in vietile altora, dar spui time-out daca cineva iti critica propria ta famile. What’s that smell? Oh, I know? Hypocrisy, double standards, bigotry.

Nu va mai sufera nimeni, bai predicatorilor religiosi. Ii vedeti pe atei ca ies sa protesteze cand cineva e inmormantat cu slujba? Respectati in pula mea dorinta omului de a face ce vrea cu trupul lui. Respectati dreptul femeii de a decide ce sa faca cu propriul ei uter si cu propriul vagin. Respectati dreptul omului de a se incinera, de a se inmormanta cu sau fara slujba.

Au innebunit „crestinii” cu Nicolaescu

Ianuarie 5, 2013

Unii, multi de altfel, au huiduit-o pe nevasta lu’ Nicolaescu pentru dorinta omului de a face ce vrea el cu propriul trup. N-a vrut sa fie innmormantat. N-a vrut sa aiba slujba. A vrut sa fie incinerat. Ce pula mea e asa greu de inteles, tovarasi crestini? Nu zice si biblia, cenusa din cenusa si tarana din tarana? Oh, am uitat. Voi habar n-aveti de metafore. Voi luati totul ad litteram. Nu suportati faptu’ ca S. Nicolaescu a facut ce-a vrut el, si i-ati luat dorinta omului ca o ofensa personala. Becali se masturbeaza in direct, ca un fariseu ce e, vis-a-vis de „viata vesnica”. Vezi domne, daca n-are slubja, Nicolaescu n-o sa aiba parte de viata vesnica. Pleaca-n pula mea d’aici. Deci zecile de mii de ani, in care oamenii traiau fara religie, fara preoti, fara profeti, si fara dogme… dupa ce mureau, ce pateau? Pateau ceva naspa, conform interpretarilor TOTAL arbitrare ale religiei. Cine pula mea stie ce se afla dupa moartea? S-a intors cineva din morti? Ah da… probabil acel Zombie Jesus, pe care oamenii il venereaza. De fapt, asta spune religia crestina, ca la momentul judecatii, mortii vor invia. LOL. Traiasca superstitia si necromantia crestineasca. Ortodocsilor, luati-va de mana cu islamistii, cu evreii, cu catolicii, cu mormonii, si cu cine mai vreti voi – duceti-va si impuscati-va. Ca sunteti niste ipocriti, niste primitivi, niste neciopliti. Tineti-va religia si propria credinta pentru voi insiva, si lasati-i pe ceilalti sa le aiba p’ale lor. Muie Patriarhiei. Muie Prea Fericitului Daniel. Orice om cu titlul de „Prea Fericit” ar trebui sa se interneze la spital. That sounds like a dangerous mental condition, cum ar zice G. Carlin. Si asa, sunt „prea fericiti” pe banii nostri – nu mai zic ca sunt scutiti de taxe si primesc subventii la greu, si nu fac niciun bine in societate cu banii aia. Or fi catolicii bancheri – care se inchina la idoli (statui), dar barem aia mai circula din bani si pe la scoli si spitale, spre deosebire de biserica noastra. Ah si apropo… statuie sau icoana, tot idolatrie se cheama. Credinta in obiecte (magice/sfinte) si in oseminte sunt tot idolatrie si superstitionism. Barem credinta primitiva animista ne scutea de toate regulile religiilor. M-am saturat de dualismul asta de cacat, prin care masele sunt idoctrinate sa faca precum vrea ierarhia (laica cat si teocratica), prin folosirea judicioasa a FRICII. De la egipteni, la Zoroastru, la Mozaism, Islamism si Crestinism – dualism. Trebuie neaparat unu bun si unu rau, un „adevar” si o „minciuna”, o cale si nu cealalta, unu cu drepturi si altu fara drepturi, unu care ar trebui sa traiasca si unul care ar trebui sa moara, iar ala care nu-i de-al nostru, sa piara el. Poporul roman e blestemat sa fie superstitios si crud, asa cum e si vorba aia – Sa moara capra vecinului. In loc sa-ti doresti 2 capre, ca sa fii mai smecher ca vecinu, tu-ti doresti napasta asupra vecinului sa se abata. Noi nu vrem sa accedem la un alt nivel, noi vrem sa-i facem pe ceilalti sa coboare la nivelul nostru. Mi-e rusine sa fiu concetatean in secolul XXI cu astfel de trogloditi in piele de om. Va numiti crestini, dar nu practicati nimic din ce zice Hristos – anume, sa-i tratati pe ceilalti asa cum si voi ati vrea sa fiti tratati la randul vostru.

Religion, the greatest affront to God

Ianuarie 2, 2013

The most disrespectful thing against GOD is religion. Religion has imposed on the Supreme Ultimate, on the prime mover, on the clock maker, on the principle which subsumes the universe, the ideas that god has a favorite corner of the universe, a favorite planet, a favorite people, a favorite religion, a favorite sex, a favorite sexuality, a favorite familial system, a favorite political-economic system, a favorite country, a chosen one or prophet, a favorite calendar, a favorite hat, a favorite day, a favorite „vicar on earth”, a favorite army, a favorite constitution, favorite leaders, parties, factions, and policies – that god has nothing better to do than catalog, prioritize, and discriminate between selfish human prayers. Religion is a sin against god and all creation.

That being said, it’s time to tackle atheism. Agnostics are not even worth mentioning, neither are the pantheists, who believe that the creator and the created is one and the same thing. By that reasoning, nature is god, and we are god. Last time I checked, the carpenter was not the same thing as a carpet. Nature derives from god, but it’s not god. God is the first spark, the first cause. In lack of this you only have circular logic. Leibniz’s clock maker example is the best. If an observer would shrink himself to go inside a clock to see how it works, all he’ll witness is the wheels working in perfect synchronization. The observer witnesses correlation not causality. The true cause lies in the one who made the clock, and winded it, in order to set its wheels in motion. The whole is more than the sum of its parts. If I have all the pieces of a table, and pile them up together, I’ll still have all the elements of the table, but I won’t have the table. What’s missing? The principle of organization. Atheism also has exaggerated claims of absolute truth, albeit they’re not as exaggerated as religious ones. I’ll just sum it up like this: even radical empiricism accepts the possibility of the existence of transempiric beings. But given their superior nature, such things are not worth the pursuit. That’s the view of radical empiricism. So if you’re an atheist and you’re being posed the question, „Is it possible for god to exist?” don’t say NO, and don’t try to beat around the bush. Say that transempirical entities may exist, and if they do, they’re certainly not the almighty, wroth, bigoted, patriarchal, human incarnated, or buddha characters of religions. But if they are, would you seriously pray to them and worship them? Would you pray to a human being who’s managed to go beyond his finite and weak form, and achieved an other plane of existence? I, for one, wouldn’t. I’d rather invoke the words of dead men and or principles which define my character and beliefs. To quote Dante Alighieri, „Consider your origins, you were not meant to live as brutes, but to follow virtue and knowledge.” Virtue and knowledge cannot work as separate notions. Having virtuous people, who lack knowledge, who are ignorant, make for perfect slaves/obedient workers. However, in nature, if you stand still, it’s the same as going backward. So a virtuous and ignorant people will sooner or later descend into barbarism. Knowledge without virtue is as perilous. Why? Because such individuals are solely clever devils.  They’ll use knowledge only to further their own ambitions, their greed. They won’t care about the consequences of their actions. They’ll use all the means to steal, guard, protect knowledge, and attack all others who want to possess it as well. Progress and peace can only be achieved through the observing and practicing of virtue and knowledge. The only likeness between the human being and the nonreligious concept of god, is the human being’s willful creative reason. Just as the biosphere is organized by a higher principle, and has a fundamentally distinct quality compared to the abiotic sphere, so does the noosphere (the sphere of human ideas/thoughts) over the biosphere. Living matter is distinct but not separate from inanimate matter. Ideas are distinct from matter, but not separate. To quote Gottfried Leibniz, „Everything that is in the mind came first through the senses, except for the mind itself.”

Therefore, whilst we are part of creation, we’re also a willful creative force inside that creation.

Note: I can’t stand those who don’t believe, seeing themselves superior to those who do believe. And I can’t stand those who believe, seeing themselves as superior to those who don’t believe.  Thus, religion (aka institutionalized faith) is the greatest affront to the Supreme Ultimate.